The profit margin trend at the world’s largest primary silver mining company has experienced a rapid decline over the past several years. Fresnillo PLC in Mexico is the largest primary silver mining company in the world. Last year, Fresnillo PLC produced 47 million of silver and 762,000 oz of gold.
For all their hard work, Fresnillo’s profit margin versus its cost of sales fell to an all-time low of 7% in 2015. This can most certainly be blamed on market intervention, which I will discuss in more detail in upcoming articles.
The chart below shows how the company’s cost of sales has increased to $1.01 billion while its attributable profit fell to only $70 million:
Now compare the huge difference between the 2015 figures to 2005. In 2005, Fresnillo PLC’s cost of sales was only $196 million versus its attributable profit of $136 million. Thus, the company’s attributable profit margin to their cost of sales was 70%… ten times higher than it was in 2015.
Furthermore, Fresnillo PLC produced a lot more silver and gold in 2015 versus 2005.
- 2005 Silver production = 35.2 Moz
- 2005 Gold production = 277,000 oz
- 2015 Silver production = 47 Moz
- 2015 Gold production = 762,000 oz
Even, though Fresnillo PLC increased their silver production significantly over the past decade, it is their gold production that experienced the most rapid growth. However, the company enjoyed a much higher profit margin on its cost of sales in 2005 when it was producing a lot less gold and silver.
If we look at the chart above, we can see that the attributable profits for the years 2013-2015 were about the same as what Fresnillo PLC made from 2005-2008, but, the cost of sales was three to four times less during the early period than they were from 2013-2015.
As we can see, something changed on Fresnillo PLC’s income statement after 2012. Again, this was due to market invention by the Federal Reserve and Central Banks via the bullion banks' paper trading markets.
That being said, I need to clarify a few things. While the chart above shows Fresnillo PLC’s cost of sales, this does not include all their total costs. The cost of sales figures only represents what takes place at the actual mine. If we add additional costs, such as administration, exploration, selling expenses, and even income tax, the total (more realistic) cost is much higher.
For example, Fresnillo PLC’s additional costs were in 2015:
- Administration cost = $63 million
- Exploration cost = $140 million
- Selling expenses = $14 million
- Income tax expense = $143 million
Thus, Fresnillo PLC’s attributable profit of $70 million was even less at only 5% when we compare it to their total revenue of $1.44 billion.
Fresnillo PLC Capital Expenditures Have Jumped Nearly Eight Times While Profits Evaporated
Fresnillo PLC’s capital expenditures were $475 million in 2015 versus $61 million in 2005. The increased capital costs were due to the expansion of new projects as well as increased higher sustaining capital costs. It would have been nice for Fresnillo PLC to make better profits on the large amount of capital and money they spend to provide gold and silver to the market.
I stated at the beginning of the article that “Market Invention” was the cause of Fresnillo’s deteriorating profit margins. While many things can be blamed on “market intervention” or “manipulation”, new evidence released from Wikileaks cable published on GATA’s website, states that it was done on purpose to keep the public from hoarding physical gold.
Again, I will be writing articles discussing this in detail. However, the primary gold and silver miners are few of the only companies producing REAL WEALTH in the world. It is a shame that “market intervention” is crippling the only industry that provides the world with real wealth.
Lastly, even though I have shown how Fresnillo PLC’s profit margin has fallen in the past several years, I believe this is one of the strongest primary silver and gold mining companies in the world. Most other gold and silver mining companies lost money in the past two-three years, but Fresnillo PLC still made some profits.
Furthermore, the best-performing mining companies in the future when the GREATEST FINANCIAL PONZI SCHEME in history starts to unravel, will be those who produce mostly gold and silver. What I mean by that is a company’s revenue that predominately comes from both gold and silver mining.
For example, Fresnillo PLC’s silver and gold metal sales in 2015 accounted for 91% of its total revenues. Compare that to Pan American Silver’s 73% of total revenues came from silver and gold metal sales for the same year.
Regardless, the market has no clue just how undervalued physical precious metals are as well as the primary gold and silver miners. When the FIAT MONETARY FAN finally hits the COW EXCREMENT, the market price of these extremely rare assets will surge higher.
About the Author:
Independent researcher Steve St. Angelo started to invest in precious metals in 2002. In 2008, he began researching areas of the gold and silver market that the majority of the precious metal analyst community has left unexplored. These areas include how energy and the falling EROI – Energy Returned On Invested – stand to impact the mining industry, precious metals, paper assets, and the overall economy.