President Donald Trump’s “America First” trade policies are upending decades of global arrangements and entanglements. Globalists are aghast that the leader of the free world is openly confrontational toward NAFTA, NATO, the European Union, United Nations, and World Trade Organization.
In rebuffing the global community by pursuing unilateral tariffs and vowing to win trade wars against both rivals and putative allies alike, Trump is playing a high-stakes game. Trump’s trade wars could test the U.S. dollar’s status as a world reserve currency.
According to economist Brad Schiller, “Nations are willing to accept U.S. dollars in exchange for their goods because they trust that the dollar will retain its value… The long history of U.S. dollar stability gives the U.S. this unique trade advantage — a key reason we can import more goods than we export year after year.”
Schiller, like many conventionally trained economists, seems to believe that our ever-growing trade deficit benefits us. In the near term, we do get to consume more things. But countries that are sending us stuff in exchange for our dollars are effectively accumulating claims on our future.
China holds title to an enormous hoard of U.S. dollar IOUs. U.S. taxpayers now owe China more than $1.2 trillion. China ran a $366 billion trade surplus in 2017 alone.
President Trump has moved to impose tens of billions of dollars in tariffs on China and other trading partners including Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. They have responded with retaliatory tariffs affecting everything from wheat crops to Harley-Davidsons.
Winning trade wars may not be as easy as Trump had thought.
Dying U.S. Senator John McCain, a longtime Trump detractor, and globalist, is among those who are actively rooting against the U.S. administration and consoling foreign countries.
“To our allies: bipartisan majorities of Americans remain pro-free trade, pro-globalization & supportive of alliances based on 70 years of shared values. Americans stand with you, even if our president doesn’t,” McCain ranted on Twitter.
It's not clear the failed former presidential candidate speaks for “bipartisan majorities of Americans” as he boasts. Nor is it clear that these foreign alliances reflect our “shared values.”
Many of the international commitments signed by previous administrations are to European-style socialists, third-world despots, and NGOs that flood our cities with welfare-seeking refugees from the world’s worst backwaters. Trump questions whether these entangling alliances benefit America.
But undoing trade agreements and raising tariffs has downside risks, to be sure.
Whether Trump’s trade wars produce more wins than losses for America’s economy remains to be seen.
Regardless, Trump’s tariffs will not close the trade deficit. They will not reduce the projected trillion-dollar budget deficits the U.S. will be running when Trump is up for re-election.
If Trump’s tariffs – which are tantamount to tax hikes that get passed on to consumers – reduce U.S. economic growth and profitability, then these federal budget deficits could come in even higher than expected.
One bold move Trump could make to shrink the deficits would be to reverse President Richard Nixon’s severing of gold from international trade. In 1971, Nixon ended the Bretton Woods system, which had allowed foreign governments to convert their accumulated dollars into gold.
While not a true sound money system, it did link international trade to the discipline and stability of gold. It prevented countries from running up large trade surpluses against the U.S. Under Bretton Woods, the U.S. current account balance was positive. In the years since it has turned sharply negative.
“Countries unhappy with U.S. tariffs & sanctions may increasingly replace their dollar reserves with gold.”
The Bretton Woods international arrangement no longer reflects the “shared values” of today’s globalists – who favor unlimited debt and untethered currency. Gold is anathema to international bankers and bureaucrats because it provides a check on their power.
Gold serves as a natural form of regulation in the international economy that obviates the need for central planning and helps solve the problem of chronic trade imbalances.
Under a gold standard, a trade deficit country such as the United States would owe gold to trade surplus countries. Gold flows would be the balancing mechanism through which accounts between countries are settled.
And since gold is the ultimate form of settlement – a global currency with no counterparty risk – national currency fluctuations, manipulations, and devaluations by trading partners would be of little concern. Trade skirmishes might still break out from time to time, but gold would act as a check on their escalation.
Countries that are unhappy with U.S. tariffs and/or economic sanctions may increasingly replace their dollar reserves with gold.
Russia, in recent years one of the world’s biggest gold buyers, is now slashing its holdings of U.S. bonds (from a high of $109 billion in 2017 to below $50 billion today). The two largest foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries, China, and Japan, have also trimmed their holdings this year.
The U.S. dollar may be slowly losing its privileged status in international finance. No other single national currency seems capable of replacing it at this time. As trade tensions escalate, gold may come to be seen more and more as a highly appealing counterweight.
About the Author:
Stefan Gleason is CEO of Money Metals Exchange, the company recently named "Best Overall Online Precious Metals Dealer" by Investopedia. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC and in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, TheStreet, and Seeking Alpha.