MEDIA STUDY WARNS: Don’t Trust Us Dummies with Your Gold

Guy Christopher Guy Christopher

Guy Christopher

June 1st, 2017 Comments

The astounding results of a groundbreaking, scientific study just released, the first of its kind we know of, confirm a lot we’ve suspected about mainstream journalists.

Journalists are different than the rest of us.

Researchers found journalists’ brains just don’t work as well as yours and mine.

That’s a polite way of saying journalists are dumber than you and I.

The study flatly says journalists have less brain power than others to “regulate emotions, solve complex problems... and think flexibly and creatively,” although study findings say they are no more stressed than the average worker.

That means they understand less about what’s going on than you and I. It also means they are not as competent to figure out what’s wrong – or how to make it right.

Drunken Man

There’s one more stunner: the study found journalists have less ability to “suppress biases” than workers in other jobs and professions.

What? Isn’t that part of the job description?

It certainly doesn’t help matters that journalists stay a little drunker than the rest of us.

Researchers found journalists use alcohol more than average. The study concluded it is “likely” alcohol contributed to the study group’s overall low scores.

Dummies R Us

The London Press Club never meant to shoot journalism’s self-image in the rump last year when it commissioned this scientific study by Dr. Tara Swart.

Dr. Swart, a neuroscientist, and psychiatrist, educated at Oxford and King’s College London, is on the staff at MIT, where she studies and teaches a carload of high-end “team building” topics, including brain performance and stress management. Her pre-test protocols include physical and psychological analysis.

Recruited constantly by Fortune 500 companies for her expertise in team building, Dr. Swart sometimes conducts one-day seminars for global corporate bigwigs.

But Dr. Swart’s work for the London Press Club was no short course. Her completed study of twenty-one journalists took seven months.

Before you complain that’s not much of a study sample, you should know over ninety journalists initially signed up.

Some just couldn’t go the distance, and gave up or flunked out.

Others were thrown out for using anti-depressants. That left forty cutting the study, but only half of those (twenty-one) sweated it out to the finish line.

In its press statement, The London Press Club went from dumb to dumber trying to emphasize a positive finding.

Journalists, said the press club, are sustained by strong beliefs in their work, and as a result, are willing to work for lower pay than they might make in other professions.

Press club honchos found it “surprising” that “journalists’ brains” showed a “lower level of function” than non-journalists. The press statement laments that alcohol and brain power problems are holding journalists back, but doesn’t address how those failings might influence their reporting, accuracy, or honesty.

Journalists Fail Another Test

Trust in news media has been in a nosedive for decades. Pew Research and Gallup polling show growing public perceptions of bias and inaccurate reporting leaving a majority of news consumers distrusting news people.

Fake News

That distrust is at an all-time high.

Even more telling, a just-released Fox News poll found 65% believe reporters write fake news, making it up as they go along.

On the upside for them, trust in journalists still ranks slightly better than car salesmen, and way, way above Congress.

Follow the Money

Nowhere would a smart journalist’s brain power be more welcomed than providing knowledge of all things financial – wealth, wealth building, and wealth preservation.

While media covers stock markets, mounting debt, taxation, and even wealth inequality, mainstream journalism ignores the greatest unreported economic story out there – gold’s significance to personal liberty, and government policies to brutally suppress that liberty.

No one has connected those dots better than GATA, the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee. And no one knows better than GATA’s Chris Powell that mainstream journalists are cowards when it comes to reporting what Powell calls “the financial news story of the century.”

GATA has been pounding that table for years, a table stacked now several feet high with solid documentation that governments hide their gold dealings and manipulate the paper price of gold, all to control financial markets across the board.

And all the while, a compliant, lapdog media plays along. Powell has offered piles of documentation to every mainstream journalist he’s ever met, with no takers.

“This is elementary journalism,” Powell said in a Money Metals podcast.

“Really any first-year journalism student could do it, but the mainstream financial press refuses to do it, I think largely because it is so sensitive to governments.”

So, just what does Dr. Swart’s study, connected to the dots at Pew and Gallup, connected to GATA’s dots of market and media manipulation, tell us about the people society has allowed to corner mainstream news and information?

One conclusion we can draw – while journalists aren’t as bright as you and I, are no more stressed but are a bit more tipsy, and cannot comprehend bias as well as the rest of us, they can be relentless in what they believe is their exclusive calling to influence thought and opinion.

And they don’t seem bothered at all that their life’s work is not trusted.

There’s one more dot to connect – one that leads to you.

Question the shortcomings of all news and information, place confidence only where it’s earned, and become your own trusted reliable source.

Guy Christopher

About the Author:

A great communicator who connected with his readers, the late Guy Christopher lived on the Gulf Coast. Writing for as a retired investigative journalist published author, and former stockbroker, Christopher previously taught college as an adjunct professor and was a veteran of the 101st Airborne in Vietnam.